<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9 Reasons Why Twitter is Better than Friendfeed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sampadswain.com/2008/12/9-reasons-why-twitter-is-better-than-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sampadswain.com/2008/12/9-reasons-why-twitter-is-better-than-friendfeed/</link>
	<description>Sampad Swain explores Marketing, Social Media and Technology trends, strategies and its impact on Business, Culture &#38; us</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:17 +0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ontario Emperor</title>
		<link>http://sampadswain.com/2008/12/9-reasons-why-twitter-is-better-than-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontario Emperor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sampadswain.com/?p=1325#comment-701</guid>
		<description>While most of your points are valid (especially point 7!), I&#039;ll quibble with a couple of them.

1. I have found FriendFeed&#039;s Bret Taylor to be just as accessible, if not more accessible, than Twitter&#039;s Biz Stone. I was talking about some feed refresh issues on FriendFeed one day, and Bret Taylor joined the conversation, acknowledged the problem, and said they were working on it. 

9. My experience with FriendFeed has been quite different, and I have run into some fairly deep conversations within my FriendFeed circle. And if you use FriendFeed rooms (a feature not available in native Twitter), you can get some fairly targeted responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While most of your points are valid (especially point 7!), I&#8217;ll quibble with a couple of them.</p>
<p>1. I have found FriendFeed&#8217;s Bret Taylor to be just as accessible, if not more accessible, than Twitter&#8217;s Biz Stone. I was talking about some feed refresh issues on FriendFeed one day, and Bret Taylor joined the conversation, acknowledged the problem, and said they were working on it. </p>
<p>9. My experience with FriendFeed has been quite different, and I have run into some fairly deep conversations within my FriendFeed circle. And if you use FriendFeed rooms (a feature not available in native Twitter), you can get some fairly targeted responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: search engine not connected to google &#124; Digg hot tags</title>
		<link>http://sampadswain.com/2008/12/9-reasons-why-twitter-is-better-than-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>search engine not connected to google &#124; Digg hot tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sampadswain.com/?p=1325#comment-669</guid>
		<description>[...] Vote  9 Reasons Why Twitter is Better than Friendfeed? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vote  9 Reasons Why Twitter is Better than Friendfeed? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
